Jump to content

Talk:Queen (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleQueen (band) was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 21, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 29, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
March 29, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
April 8, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
May 19, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 4, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 29, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
February 24, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 9, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 26, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
February 5, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
June 11, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
September 29, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Article quality

[edit]

This article starts out quite well, but when we come into the internet age, changes into an indiscriminate list of everything the various incarnations of the band have done. Any appetite to to make it more encyclopedic? John (talk) 15:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There is opinions

[edit]

Its a great article but when you see the writing it has a lot of opinions.User:Puppet1949 — Preceding undated comment added 23:02, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2025

[edit]

In the logo section, please replace the current file with this one: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Queen_Crest.png#mw-jump-to-license The paragraph describes the logo, and the new insignia fits the description. 2601:404:D000:B915:6490:8E75:9747:D56B (talk) 02:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Aston305 (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

I was looking through this 2010 revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Queen_(band)&oldid=360203019

There is a paragraph that describes the logo. The deleted file was fair use, but it was removed with the excuse that there is no critical commentary about the logo. If there was a paragraph describing the logo, why was it not considered “critical commentary”? 2601:404:D000:B915:E865:EC2B:D95D:E799 (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]